Market Research for Media with portable people meters Best answer on the web
January 7th, 2009http://www.arbitron.com/portable_people_meters/home.htm
Can you find for me: 1) any news articles regarding this, 2) any links to competition that you can find, 3) anything else that would be interesting or relevant.
This should be a fun and easy project. I appreciate your help.
Let us answer your question first about competitors. In our first article, it mentions that GFK/Telecontrol Mediawatch and Eurisko NOP World Media Monitor are the direct competitors of Arbitron?s Portable People Meter.
?The testing, the first of its kind in the world, will see Rajar put the Arbitron Portable People Meter, the Eurisko NOP World Media Monitor and the GfK/Telecontrol MediaWatch through their paces as it looks to see which offers the best replacement for its antiquated diary system.?
?Rajar takes another step on road towards digital testing?
http://www.brandrepublic.com/mediabulletin/news_story.cfm?articleID=224425&Origin=MB11102004
However; unlike Arbitron the websites of both companies do not showcase the actual gadget. Anyway here are the links to Eurisko and GFK.
GFK
http://www.gfk.com/
Eurisko
http://www.eurisko.it/english/english/euris2inglese/prodotti/audinet.html
Another possible competitor is IQStat but this time the gadget is for cars.
?Like Arbitron's Portable People Meter (PPM), the IQStat system uses technology to track previously un-trackable media exposure. IQStat says it's focused on measuring consumer behavior and ad exposure. It considers its data to be complementary to what Arbitron provides, although IQStat will also provide ratings.?
?Start-Up Wires Cars for Ad Measurement? by Pamela Parker
http://www.clickz.com/news/article.php/3105831
IQStat Official Website
http://www.navigauge.com/
-------------------------------------------
Our next links meanwhile will be news articles I found for the Portable People Meter. I will present them according to their publication date so you can view the development of media coverage for the PPM through time. I will also provide highlights and any interesting excerpts from the articles.
2000
?In June Arbitron and Nielsen committed to a history-making deal, agreeing to cooperate on the testing of a new electronic technology which may someday replace the diaries now used to measure TV viewing and radio listening in local markets.?
?Arbitron has been working on its PPM technology for almost nine years, perfecting and miniaturizing the passive measurement device that uses hidden audio codes to identify the program sources.?
?Nielsen forced Arbitron out of the TV ratings business in 1993 after a bruising battle where deep pockets won out over big ambition. In the late 1980s, Arbitron developed and implemented a national people meter panel to take on NTI (Nielsen Television Index). Nielsen aggressively counterattacked by expanding their spot TV ratings service (NSI), relying on a surplus of household meters and the deep pockets provided by the network TV business. Arbitron attracted endorsements, but only one major network supporter and eventually pulled the plug on its national ambitions and its local service too.?
?Arbitron's Portable People Meter? by Dave Zornow (September)
http://www.tngresearch.com/newsite/articles/csp_arb_ppm.htm
*************
2001
?The Arbitron Company, a media and marketing research firm that provides ratings information for radio stations throughout the U.S., is recruiting people in the Philadelphia area to take part in a trial of a revolutionary new method for monitoring media exposure. Arbitron will outfit each willing participant with its new Portable People Meter (PPM), a pager-sized device that hears broadcast signals that the wearer hears, and notes the date, time and duration of each exposure. The PPM even has a motion sensor, to record how much it?s been worn.?
?Sound a little spooky? It gets better. The PPM works by detecting an inaudible code that can be embedded in any broadcast signal. Fifty-four radio and television stations in the Philadelphia market are already including such codes in their broadcasts, or are capable of doing so, and Arbitron hopes to have more than 70 signed up by the time the test is under way. Someone you know might be wearing a PPM right now.?
?It Knows What You Watched Last Tuesday? by Frank Lewis (January)
http://www.citypaper.net/articles/011801/cs.coverstory.shtml
?Arbitron reports that initial findings from a test group of 300 Wilmingtonians show that the device is being accepted and used properly by test subjects.?
?Over 80 percent of the test subjects were found to be properly using the device, which involves taking the PPM from a carriage unit in the morning, wearing it all day, and replacing it at night, at which point the PPM uploads its data to Arbitron.?
?Portable People Meter does well in early tests? By Gabriel Spitzer (April 21)
http://www.medialifemagazine.com/news2001/apr01/apr23/4_thurs/news3thursday.html
**********
2002
?PPM numbers suggest that cume is up significantly for radio. PPM showed an average daily cumulative audience of 75.9% vs. 66.0% from the diary. The PPM is picking up increased listening occasions, as well as the number of stations PPM carriers, your listeners, are tuned to.?
?Implication: The great thing is that it positively impacts all radio stations, almost regardless of format. As an industry we?ve got to be happy. As programmers it means we?re now measuring all listening occasions to our station regardless of how much time listeners spend with us.?
?The People Meter and Programming? by David Rogerson and Mike McVay
http://www.mcvaymedia.com/infopac/02articles/peoplemeter.htm
?A major concern revolves around data that show people listen to twice as many radio stations as previously thought and that stations, on average, have 10 times the number of least-frequent listeners with the PPM as they did with the diary.?
" Questions over Portable People Meter? by Kevin Downey (Aug. 6)
http://www.medialifemagazine.com/news2002/aug02/aug05/2_tues/news4tuesday.html
?Yet Patchen concedes Arbitron has ?some detective work? to figure out why morning drive numbers for radio are lower in PPM ratings compared to diaries. Patchen admits its Philadelphia tests have left them with more questions than answers on the most critical daypart for radio.?
?One unresolved issue has the making of a major stumbling block between the different constituencies that Arbitron serves. Advertisers are likely to push for movement beyond its current quarter hour ratings to a methodology that provides something near to minute-by-minute numbers.?
?Arbitron's PPM Plagued By Unanswered Questions? (Oct. 10)
http://www.mediapost.com/printmdn.cfm?pd=10/10/02&ed=T&p=
**********
2003
?This is an international roll out ? Already countries such as Canada, France and Belgium have joined the growing number of countries committed to PPM measurement or assessment in some form.?
?Measurement can be continuous 365 days a year, 24 hours a day ? no rest for the wicked. Implication ? you?ll be on your toes 52 weeks a year, 24 hours a day, 7 days a week.?
?PPM?s are carried by people who are part of a panel ? this is much the same way TV set top meter respondents are recruited ? unlike the diary which is a new sample each week.?
?Programming in a PPM World ? 12 months On? by David Rogerson and Mike McVay
http://www.mcvaymedia.com/adltcontmp/03/peoplemeter_12months.htm
?Arbitron announced that M diam trie, the French provider of TV, radio, Internet and cinema audience measurement, has signed a license agreement that will enable the independent media measurement company to evaluate Arbitron?s Portable People Meter system in Paris.?
?The two-year agreement will enable M diam trie to evaluate the PPM encoding system and the willingness of Parisians to keep the pager-sized PPM device with them as they go about their daily routines.?
?Arbitron and M diam trie to carry out market trials of new audience measurement system? (April 26) http://broadcastengineering.com/news/broadcasting_arbitron_m%25E9diam%25E9trie_carry/
?Arbitron Inc. (NYSE: ARB) and Nielsen Media Research today announced that preliminary tests of methods to improve consumer response rates in the Portable People Meter system were positive. In a key research test of two sampling and recruitment techniques, response rates among panelists increased significantly over those for prior sampling and recruitment methodologies used for the PPM. Additional tests are underway in order to assure that these initial success levels can be maintained.?
?Arbitron and Nielsen Report Progress in Portable People Meter -PPM- Response Rate Testing? (Oct. 21) http://www.findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0EIN/is_2003_Oct_21/ai_109063773
**********
2004
?The Portable People Meter is a big hit with media companies, because it doesn't require the wearer to do any work, and it keeps them honest. Before the PPM entered the scene, the companies that ran monitoring services gave notebooks to volunteers to write down the shows they watched. But people are forgetful and they're lazy, so notebook data is a little iffy. Worse, people fib. They'll watch Bikini Insanity on cable, and write Meet the Press in their notebook.?
?The Portable People Meter has a lot going for it. So much, that Arbitron is adding GPS capability to the device so it can tell where its wearer is consuming media. That's key, because the Portable People Meter is all about monitoring people, not TVs or radios.?
?The Portable People Meter? By Mark Frauenfelder (Mar. 26)
http://www.thefeature.com/article?articleid=100464
?Following Cox Radio's lead, Radio One has told Arbitron that it will decline to participate in Arbitron?s second proposed test of the portable people meter in Houston.?
??Without Cox, the research would not be valid. Flawed research does more harm than good,? said Mary Catherine Sneed, COO of Radio One.?
?Radio One Will Not Participate in Arbitron Test? by Katy Bachman (Mar. 29)
http://www.mediaweek.com/mediaweek/headlines/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1000474587
?In PPM tests, television viewership was reported to be as much as 80 percent more than what was recorded through the traditional means. The argument for PPM's is that these higher numbers are a more accurate reflection of the audience. Keep in mind though that PPM's don't cause more people to tune in. The "real audience" levels (the actual number of people tuned in) are the same - they'll just have a higher number associated with it.?
?Arbitron's PPM's? By Devin Johnson (May 20)
http://www.rightplacemedia.com/redline/archive/issue58/article1.htm
?For the past few years, about 1,500 people in the Philadelphia area have worn small electronic devices that keep track of every bit of radio programming they might hear in the car, at the office, as they walk to lunch, when they drop by a friend's house or when they hit happy hour after work.?
?The gadget, the Portable People Meter, contains motion detectors to make certain that someone is really wearing the device, and extra-sensitive microphones that pick up codes hidden in each program.?
?The Portable People Meter Knows All? by Marc Fisher (June 20)
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A52438-2004Jun18.html
?Arbitron (NYSE:ARB) and Nielsen Media Research announced today that the two companies have devised and tested new approaches that yield sample performance indicators (SPI) that are in line with what Nielsen would expect when recruiting and maintaining a set-top meter panel. These measures are substantially higher than those achieved by Arbitron in the first U.S. Market Trial of the PPM in Philadelphia in 2002.?
?The new methods were different from the 2002 methodology in that they: utilized membership representatives for at least some of the recruitment and on-going maintenance of the panel; increased the financial incentives given to panelists; and included a number of other methodological improvements.?
?ARBITRON AND NIELSEN IMPROVE PORTABLE PEOPLE METER (PPM) RESPONSE RATES? (July 12)
http://www.nielsenmedia.com/newsreleases/2004/PPMResponseRates.htm
?Arbitron's portable people meter technology passed its first important commercial milestone, except it's in Canada. not the U.S.?
?BBM Canada, the Canadian industry consortium for audience ratings, Wednesday said it had adopted the PPM as the official TV ratings system for French-language TV in Quebec and Montreal. By the end of the year, the BBM will phase out push-button people meters in those two markets.?
?Arbitron's PPM Passes Milestone in Canada? by Katy Bachman (July 22)
http://www.mediaweek.com/mediaweek/search/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1000583212
?Consumer products maker Procter & Gamble, market research group VNU and radio ratings service Arbitron Inc. on Wednesday announced a deal to explore developing a research service to study how consumers react to advertising.?
?The service would study how exposing consumers to advertising on multiple media affects their shopping and purchasing behavior. Arbitron and VNU said the service would be separate and distinct from any rating services already provided for TV and radio.?
?Arbitron, VNU, Procter Form Market Research Pact? (Sept. 24)
http://www.reuters.com/newsArticle.jhtml?type=industryNews&storyID=6368362
?Now that Arbitron and Nielsen Media Research have successfully completed a final round of testing the portable people meter in Philadelphia, Arbitron is forging ahead with its second test market: Houston.?
?By second quarter 2005, Arbitron expects to produce initial ratings for TV, radio and cable nets in the market based on a sample of 2,100 consumers. It will continue through winter 2006 to give the industry a year of data to pore over. If the demonstration is successful and wins marketplace support, Arbitron anticipates Houston could be the first PPM market in 2006, six years after it began testing the service.?
?Arbitron Readies Texas PPM? by Katy Bachman (Sept. 27)
http://www.mediaweek.com/mediaweek/headlines/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1000642152
?Meanwhile, the PPM's Houston test, the second major U.S. field trial of the PPM system, has been plagued by uncertainty, with several top radio broadcasters threatening to boycott it by not allowing their programming to be coded for the PPM meters. The radio industry has been especially concerned by the economic impact PPMs could have on the radio marketplace??
?Nielsen, Arbitron Reveal Aggressive PPM Rollout Plan, Would Cover 50 Markets
by Joe Mandese (Sept. 29)
http://www.mediapost.com/dtls_dsp_news.cfm?newsID=271311
***********
No Specified Date
Our next link provides an interesting discussion and also a link at the end to the advantages and disadvantages of PPMs.
?Future of Audience Measurement?
http://edtech.tennessee.edu/~dob/peoplem.html
?The battery in the PPM is good for 27 hours and the unit will hold a week's worth of data.?
?To recruit the PPM panel, Arbitron starts the same way they do to recruit diary holders; with a random sample of telephone numbers. Panel sampling is two-phased; Arbitron conducts a telephone enumeration study to discover household characteristics including county, household size, presence of children, employment status, race or ethnic background, language preference, number of television sets and the presence of cable or satellite TV in the household.?
?EXCLUSIVE UPDATE REPORT FROM HARRY VALENTINE, EVP?
http://www.sabomedia.com/features/ppm.shtml
?The ratings are so crucial to advertising success that, typically, a station spends 1% of its total ad revenue on market research, according to Thom Mocarsky, Arbitron's communications vice president. The cost per station depends on the market, he said, but is usually a "five- to six-figure investment" for the Arbitron ratings.?
"?Arbitron wields a lot of power,? said Larry Patrick of Patrick Communications, a major broker for TV and radio stations based in Columbia. But "Arbitron has an unenviable business to be in. You're almost constantly being criticized" by radio stations that find their market position has slipped or question the sampling technique. A point difference in a rating can mean a $10 million difference in ad revenues for a major station.?
?Arbitron Meter Aims To Transform Broadcast Ratings? by Len Lazarick
http://www.bizmonthly.com/8_2001/3.html
?There is, of course, compensation awarded to cooperative PPM participants. When the system detects motion (i.e. when it's being carried) a green light comes on. At the end of the day, "green light time" is recorded and converted to "points." These are used to determine the "incentives" paid to respondents.?
?What separates the device from earlier models is its portability. No matter where the PPM subject watches T.V. or listens to the radio (think showers here), and no matter where or when he or she uses the Internet, the Portable People Meter can ?capture and report media exposure.?"
?Green Light Time: The "Sheer Fun Factor" of an Electronic Leash? by John Nelson
http://www.themediadrome.com/content/articles/tv_articles/green_light_time.htm
Search terms used:
Arbitron ppm ?portable people meter? interesting issues privacy
GFK, Eurisko, IQStat
I hope these links would help you in your research. Before rating this answer, please ask for a clarification if you have a question or if you would need further information.
Thanks for visiting us.
Regards,
Easterangel-ga
Google Answers Researcher